Information on Result #714527

Linear OA(837, 74, F8, 21) (dual of [74, 37, 22]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([62,18]), C2 = C([4,19]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([4,18]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([62,19]) based on
  1. linear OA(831, 63, F8, 20) (dual of [63, 32, 21]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,18}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
  2. linear OA(828, 63, F8, 16) (dual of [63, 35, 17]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {4,5,…,19}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
  3. linear OA(833, 63, F8, 21) (dual of [63, 30, 22]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,19}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
  4. linear OA(826, 63, F8, 15) (dual of [63, 37, 16]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {4,5,…,18}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
  5. linear OA(84, 9, F8, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,8)), using
  6. linear OA(80, 2, F8, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(837, 37, F8, 2, 21) (dual of [(37, 2), 37, 22]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding