Information on Result #714863

Linear OA(880, 94, F8, 54) (dual of [94, 14, 55]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([10,54]), C2 = C([1,44]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([10,44]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1,54]) based on
  1. linear OA(855, 63, F8, 45) (dual of [63, 8, 46]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {10,11,…,54}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 46 [i]
  2. linear OA(854, 63, F8, 44) (dual of [63, 9, 45]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,44], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 45 [i]
  3. linear OA(860, 63, F8, 54) (dual of [63, 3, 55]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,54], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 55 [i]
  4. linear OA(847, 63, F8, 35) (dual of [63, 16, 36]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = {10,11,…,44}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 36 [i]
  5. linear OA(811, 17, F8, 9) (dual of [17, 6, 10]-code), using
  6. linear OA(89, 14, F8, 8) (dual of [14, 5, 9]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(881, 95, F8, 54) (dual of [95, 14, 55]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
2Linear OOA(880, 47, F8, 2, 54) (dual of [(47, 2), 14, 55]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding