Information on Result #717963

Linear OA(980, 124, F9, 41) (dual of [124, 44, 42]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([9,41]), C2 = C([1,29]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([9,29]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1,41]) based on
  1. linear OA(950, 80, F9, 33) (dual of [80, 30, 34]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {9,10,…,41}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
  2. linear OA(944, 80, F9, 29) (dual of [80, 36, 30]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,29], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 30 [i]
  3. linear OA(958, 80, F9, 41) (dual of [80, 22, 42]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,41], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 42 [i]
  4. linear OA(934, 80, F9, 21) (dual of [80, 46, 22]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {9,10,…,29}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
  5. linear OA(914, 28, F9, 11) (dual of [28, 14, 12]-code), using
  6. linear OA(98, 16, F9, 7) (dual of [16, 8, 8]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(980, 62, F9, 2, 41) (dual of [(62, 2), 44, 42]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding