Information on Result #717990

Linear OA(971, 112, F9, 39) (dual of [112, 41, 40]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([71,22]), C2 = C([0,29]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,22]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([71,29]) based on
  1. linear OA(949, 80, F9, 32) (dual of [80, 31, 33]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−9,−8,…,22}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
  2. linear OA(945, 80, F9, 30) (dual of [80, 35, 31]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,29], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
  3. linear OA(955, 80, F9, 39) (dual of [80, 25, 40]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−9,−8,…,29}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
  4. linear OA(937, 80, F9, 23) (dual of [80, 43, 24]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
  5. linear OA(99, 19, F9, 8) (dual of [19, 10, 9]-code), using
  6. linear OA(97, 13, F9, 6) (dual of [13, 6, 7]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(970, 111, F9, 38) (dual of [111, 41, 39]-code) [i]Truncation
2Linear OOA(971, 56, F9, 2, 39) (dual of [(56, 2), 41, 40]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding