Information on Result #718126

Linear OA(977, 108, F9, 45) (dual of [108, 31, 46]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([10,51]), C2 = C([7,41]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([10,41]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([7,51]) based on
  1. linear OA(959, 80, F9, 42) (dual of [80, 21, 43]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {10,11,…,51}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 43 [i]
  2. linear OA(954, 80, F9, 35) (dual of [80, 26, 36]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {7,8,…,41}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 36 [i]
  3. linear OA(965, 80, F9, 45) (dual of [80, 15, 46]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {7,8,…,51}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 46 [i]
  4. linear OA(948, 80, F9, 32) (dual of [80, 32, 33]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {10,11,…,41}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
  5. linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
  6. linear OA(92, 8, F9, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,9)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(977, 54, F9, 2, 45) (dual of [(54, 2), 31, 46]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding