Information on Result #718243

Linear OA(986, 109, F9, 54) (dual of [109, 23, 55]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([68,40]), C2 = C([0,41]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,40]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([68,41]) based on
  1. linear OA(970, 80, F9, 53) (dual of [80, 10, 54]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−12,−11,…,40}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 54 [i]
  2. linear OA(959, 80, F9, 42) (dual of [80, 21, 43]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,41], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 43 [i]
  3. linear OA(972, 80, F9, 54) (dual of [80, 8, 55]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = {−12,−11,…,41}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 55 [i]
  4. linear OA(957, 80, F9, 41) (dual of [80, 23, 42]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,40], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 42 [i]
  5. linear OA(914, 27, F9, 11) (dual of [27, 13, 12]-code), using
  6. linear OA(90, 2, F9, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.