Information on Result #732883
Linear OA(2536, 660, F25, 14) (dual of [660, 624, 15]-code), using (u, u+v)-construction based on
- linear OA(258, 29, F25, 7) (dual of [29, 21, 8]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,9P) ⊂ AG(F,10P) [i] based on
- linear OA(257, 26, F25, 7) (dual of [26, 19, 8]-code or 26-arc in PG(6,25)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,9P) with degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- linear OA(255, 26, F25, 5) (dual of [26, 21, 6]-code or 26-arc in PG(4,25)), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,10P) with degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26 (see above)
- linear OA(251, 3, F25, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, s, F25, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to AG(F,9P) ⊂ AG(F,10P) [i] based on
- linear OA(2528, 631, F25, 14) (dual of [631, 603, 15]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([622,10]), C2 = C([0,11]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,10]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([622,11]) [i] based on
- linear OA(2525, 624, F25, 13) (dual of [624, 599, 14]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−2,−1,…,10}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 14 [i]
- linear OA(2523, 624, F25, 12) (dual of [624, 601, 13]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(2527, 624, F25, 14) (dual of [624, 597, 15]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−2,−1,…,11}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- linear OA(2521, 624, F25, 11) (dual of [624, 603, 12]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- linear OA(251, 5, F25, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, 25, F25, 1) (dual of [25, 24, 2]-code), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(24,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, 25, F25, 1) (dual of [25, 24, 2]-code), using
- linear OA(250, 2, F25, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(250, s, F25, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([622,10]), C2 = C([0,11]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,10]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([622,11]) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(2536, 330, F25, 2, 14) (dual of [(330, 2), 624, 15]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |