Information on Result #906555

Linear OOA(779, 48, F7, 2, 53) (dual of [(48, 2), 17, 54]-NRT-code), using generalized (u, u+v)-construction based on
  1. linear OOA(78, 8, F7, 2, 8) (dual of [(8, 2), 8, 9]-NRT-code), using
  2. linear OOA(710, 8, F7, 2, 10) (dual of [(8, 2), 6, 11]-NRT-code), using
  3. linear OOA(713, 8, F7, 2, 13) (dual of [(8, 2), 3, 14]-NRT-code), using
  4. linear OOA(716, 8, F7, 2, 16) (dual of [(8, 2), 0, 17]-NRT-code), using
  5. linear OOA(716, 8, F7, 2, 16) (dual of [(8, 2), 0, 17]-NRT-code) (see above)
  6. linear OOA(716, 8, F7, 2, 16) (dual of [(8, 2), 0, 17]-NRT-code) (see above)

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only		Method
1Linear OOA(779, 48, F7, 2, 52) (dual of [(48, 2), 17, 53]-NRT-code) [i]Strength Reduction for OOAs
2Linear OOA(778, 47, F7, 2, 52) (dual of [(47, 2), 16, 53]-NRT-code) [i]Truncation for OOAs
3Linear OOA(777, 47, F7, 2, 51) (dual of [(47, 2), 17, 52]-NRT-code) [i]
4Linear OOA(776, 46, F7, 2, 50) (dual of [(46, 2), 16, 51]-NRT-code) [i]
5Linear OOA(775, 46, F7, 2, 49) (dual of [(46, 2), 17, 50]-NRT-code) [i]
6Linear OOA(774, 45, F7, 2, 48) (dual of [(45, 2), 16, 49]-NRT-code) [i]
7Linear OOA(773, 45, F7, 2, 47) (dual of [(45, 2), 17, 48]-NRT-code) [i]
8Linear OOA(772, 44, F7, 2, 46) (dual of [(44, 2), 16, 47]-NRT-code) [i]
9Linear OOA(771, 44, F7, 2, 45) (dual of [(44, 2), 17, 46]-NRT-code) [i]
10Linear OOA(770, 43, F7, 2, 44) (dual of [(43, 2), 16, 45]-NRT-code) [i]
11Linear OOA(769, 43, F7, 2, 43) (dual of [(43, 2), 17, 44]-NRT-code) [i]