Information on Result #909225
Linear OOA(358, 31, F3, 2, 42) (dual of [(31, 2), 4, 43]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(34, 4, F3, 2, 4) (dual of [(4, 2), 4, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;4,3) [i]
- linear OOA(350, 27, F3, 2, 37) (dual of [(27, 2), 4, 38]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(350, 27, F3, 2, 39) (dual of [(27, 2), 4, 40]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(97, 9, F9, 7) (dual of [9, 2, 8]-code or 9-arc in PG(6,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(2,9) [i]
- linear OOA(34, 3, F3, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;2,3) [i]
- linear OA(97, 9, F9, 7) (dual of [9, 2, 8]-code or 9-arc in PG(6,9)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(350, 27, F3, 2, 39) (dual of [(27, 2), 4, 40]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.