Information on Result #910445
Linear OOA(8157, 81, F8, 2, 140) (dual of [(81, 2), 5, 141]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(811, 8, F8, 2, 11) (dual of [(8, 2), 5, 12]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;5,8) [i]
- linear OOA(8141, 73, F8, 2, 128) (dual of [(73, 2), 5, 129]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(811, 8, F8, 2, 11) (dual of [(8, 2), 5, 12]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(8125, 65, F8, 2, 116) (dual of [(65, 2), 5, 117]-NRT-code), using
- standard lengthening with (d0,…,d1) = (115,116) [i] based on linear OOA(8123, 64, F8, 2, 114) (dual of [(64, 2), 5, 115]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,13P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(8157, 81, F8, 2, 139) (dual of [(81, 2), 5, 140]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(8157, 81, F8, 2, 138) (dual of [(81, 2), 5, 139]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||