Information on Result #910451
Linear OOA(8147, 76, F8, 2, 133) (dual of [(76, 2), 5, 134]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(817, 11, F8, 2, 16) (dual of [(11, 2), 5, 17]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(817, 14, F8, 2, 16) (dual of [(14, 2), 11, 17]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,11P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(817, 14, F8, 2, 16) (dual of [(14, 2), 11, 17]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(8125, 65, F8, 2, 116) (dual of [(65, 2), 5, 117]-NRT-code), using
- standard lengthening with (d0,…,d1) = (115,116) [i] based on linear OOA(8123, 64, F8, 2, 114) (dual of [(64, 2), 5, 115]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,13P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(8147, 76, F8, 2, 132) (dual of [(76, 2), 5, 133]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
2 | Linear OOA(8147, 76, F8, 2, 131) (dual of [(76, 2), 5, 132]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OOA(8147, 76, F8, 2, 130) (dual of [(76, 2), 5, 131]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OOA(8147, 76, F8, 2, 129) (dual of [(76, 2), 5, 130]-NRT-code) | [i] |