Information on Result #910534
Linear OOA(8161, 82, F8, 2, 149) (dual of [(82, 2), 3, 150]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(815, 9, F8, 2, 15) (dual of [(9, 2), 3, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,8) [i]
- linear OOA(8143, 73, F8, 2, 133) (dual of [(73, 2), 3, 134]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(813, 8, F8, 2, 13) (dual of [(8, 2), 3, 14]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;3,8) [i]
- linear OOA(8127, 65, F8, 2, 119) (dual of [(65, 2), 3, 120]-NRT-code), using
- standard lengthening with (d0,…,d1) = (118,119) [i] based on linear OOA(8125, 64, F8, 2, 117) (dual of [(64, 2), 3, 118]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,10P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- linear OOA(813, 8, F8, 2, 13) (dual of [(8, 2), 3, 14]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(8161, 82, F8, 2, 148) (dual of [(82, 2), 3, 149]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |