Information on Result #910613
Linear OOA(9147, 76, F9, 2, 129) (dual of [(76, 2), 5, 130]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(915, 10, F9, 2, 15) (dual of [(10, 2), 5, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;5,9) [i]
- linear OOA(9127, 66, F9, 2, 113) (dual of [(66, 2), 5, 114]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(915, 10, F9, 2, 15) (dual of [(10, 2), 5, 16]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(9107, 56, F9, 2, 97) (dual of [(56, 2), 5, 98]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(951, 28, F9, 2, 48) (dual of [(28, 2), 5, 49]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,7P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,7P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(951, 28, F9, 2, 48) (dual of [(28, 2), 5, 49]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(9147, 76, F9, 2, 128) (dual of [(76, 2), 5, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |