Information on Result #914581
Linear OOA(288, 70, F2, 2, 31) (dual of [(70, 2), 52, 32]-NRT-code), using concatenation of two NRT-codes based on
- linear OOA(1615, 14, F16, 2, 15) (dual of [(14, 2), 13, 16]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(1615, 16, F16, 2, 15) (dual of [(16, 2), 17, 16]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;17,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(1615, 16, F16, 2, 15) (dual of [(16, 2), 17, 16]-NRT-code), using
- linear OA(21, 5, F2, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(288, 70, F2, 2, 30) (dual of [(70, 2), 52, 31]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
2 | Linear OOA(289, 70, F2, 2, 31) (dual of [(70, 2), 51, 32]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Duplication | |
3 | Linear OOA(287, 69, F2, 2, 30) (dual of [(69, 2), 51, 31]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
4 | Linear OOA(288, 35, F2, 4, 31) (dual of [(35, 4), 52, 32]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding |