Information on Result #941966
Linear OOA(4186, 95, F4, 2, 157) (dual of [(95, 2), 4, 158]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(46, 5, F4, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 4, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;4,4) [i]
- linear OOA(4176, 90, F4, 2, 150) (dual of [(90, 2), 4, 151]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(46, 5, F4, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 4, 7]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(4166, 85, F4, 2, 143) (dual of [(85, 2), 4, 144]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1615, 17, F16, 15) (dual of [17, 2, 16]-code or 17-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,16) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,16) [i]
- linear OOA(48, 5, F4, 2, 8) (dual of [(5, 2), 2, 9]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,4) [i]
- linear OA(1615, 17, F16, 15) (dual of [17, 2, 16]-code or 17-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(4186, 95, F4, 2, 156) (dual of [(95, 2), 4, 157]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(4186, 95, F4, 2, 155) (dual of [(95, 2), 4, 156]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(4196, 100, F4, 2, 164) (dual of [(100, 2), 4, 165]-NRT-code) | [i] | Juxtaposition for OOAs | |
| 4 | Linear OOA(4198, 101, F4, 2, 165) (dual of [(101, 2), 4, 166]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OOA(4200, 102, F4, 2, 167) (dual of [(102, 2), 4, 168]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OOA(4202, 103, F4, 2, 169) (dual of [(103, 2), 4, 170]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||