Information on Result #1021767

Linear OOA(796, 48, F7, 3, 53) (dual of [(48, 3), 48, 54]-NRT-code), using generalized (u, u+v)-construction based on
  1. linear OOA(78, 8, F7, 3, 8) (dual of [(8, 3), 16, 9]-NRT-code), using
  2. linear OOA(710, 8, F7, 3, 10) (dual of [(8, 3), 14, 11]-NRT-code), using
  3. linear OOA(713, 8, F7, 3, 13) (dual of [(8, 3), 11, 14]-NRT-code), using
  4. linear OOA(717, 8, F7, 3, 17) (dual of [(8, 3), 7, 18]-NRT-code), using
  5. linear OOA(724, 8, F7, 3, 24) (dual of [(8, 3), 0, 25]-NRT-code), using
  6. linear OOA(724, 8, F7, 3, 24) (dual of [(8, 3), 0, 25]-NRT-code) (see above)

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(796, 48, F7, 3, 52) (dual of [(48, 3), 48, 53]-NRT-code) [i]Strength Reduction for OOAs
2Linear OOA(795, 47, F7, 3, 52) (dual of [(47, 3), 46, 53]-NRT-code) [i]Truncation for OOAs
3Linear OOA(794, 47, F7, 3, 51) (dual of [(47, 3), 47, 52]-NRT-code) [i]
4Linear OOA(793, 47, F7, 3, 50) (dual of [(47, 3), 48, 51]-NRT-code) [i]
5Linear OOA(792, 46, F7, 3, 49) (dual of [(46, 3), 46, 50]-NRT-code) [i]
6Linear OOA(791, 46, F7, 3, 48) (dual of [(46, 3), 47, 49]-NRT-code) [i]