Information on Result #1021843

Linear OOA(788, 40, F7, 3, 53) (dual of [(40, 3), 32, 54]-NRT-code), using generalized (u, u+v)-construction based on
  1. linear OOA(710, 8, F7, 3, 10) (dual of [(8, 3), 14, 11]-NRT-code), using
  2. linear OOA(713, 8, F7, 3, 13) (dual of [(8, 3), 11, 14]-NRT-code), using
  3. linear OOA(717, 8, F7, 3, 17) (dual of [(8, 3), 7, 18]-NRT-code), using
  4. linear OOA(724, 8, F7, 3, 24) (dual of [(8, 3), 0, 25]-NRT-code), using
  5. linear OOA(724, 8, F7, 3, 24) (dual of [(8, 3), 0, 25]-NRT-code) (see above)

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(788, 40, F7, 3, 52) (dual of [(40, 3), 32, 53]-NRT-code) [i]Strength Reduction for OOAs
2Linear OOA(787, 39, F7, 3, 52) (dual of [(39, 3), 30, 53]-NRT-code) [i]Truncation for OOAs
3Linear OOA(786, 39, F7, 3, 51) (dual of [(39, 3), 31, 52]-NRT-code) [i]
4Linear OOA(785, 39, F7, 3, 50) (dual of [(39, 3), 32, 51]-NRT-code) [i]
5Linear OOA(784, 38, F7, 3, 49) (dual of [(38, 3), 30, 50]-NRT-code) [i]
6Linear OOA(783, 38, F7, 3, 48) (dual of [(38, 3), 31, 49]-NRT-code) [i]