Information on Result #1851582
There is no (14, m, 70)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (14, 206, 70)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(5206, 70, S5, 3, 192), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 218 777880 862305 763141 783501 890707 492833 251052 806603 532023 086130 988700 349634 056449 104123 060188 013369 346143 356664 047274 762197 048403 322696 685791 015625 / 193 > 5206 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (14, 69)-sequence in base 5 | [i] | Net from Sequence | |
2 | No (14, 14+k, 70)-net in base 5 for arbitrarily large k | [i] | Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m) | |
3 | No (14, m, 70)-net in base 5 with unbounded m | [i] | ||
4 | No digital (14, 14+k, 70)-net over F5 for arbitrarily large k | [i] | ||
5 | No digital (14, m, 70)-net over F5 with unbounded m | [i] |