Information on Result #1852485

There is no (38, m, 289)-net in base 8 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (38, 863, 289)-net in base 8, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (38, 288)-sequence in base 8 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (38, 38+k, 289)-net in base 8 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (38, m, 289)-net in base 8 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (38, 38+k, 289)-net over F8 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (38, m, 289)-net over F8 with unbounded m [i]