Information on Result #1852632

There is no (87, m, 635)-net in base 8 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (87, 1901, 635)-net in base 8, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (87, 634)-sequence in base 8 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (87, 87+k, 635)-net in base 8 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (87, m, 635)-net in base 8 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (87, 87+k, 635)-net over F8 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (87, m, 635)-net over F8 with unbounded m [i]