Information on Result #1853760

There is no (16, m, 435)-net in base 25 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (16, 867, 435)-net in base 25, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 434)-sequence in base 25 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (16, 16+k, 435)-net in base 25 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (16, m, 435)-net in base 25 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (16, 16+k, 435)-net over F25 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (16, m, 435)-net over F25 with unbounded m [i]