Information on Result #1855062

There is no (5, m, 301)-net in base 49 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (5, 299, 301)-net in base 49, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (5, 300)-sequence in base 49 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (5, 5+k, 301)-net in base 49 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (5, m, 301)-net in base 49 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (5, 5+k, 301)-net over F49 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (5, m, 301)-net over F49 with unbounded m [i]