Information on Result #1856221
There is no (12, m, 34)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (12, 97, 34)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(397, 34, S3, 3, 85), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 858962 534553 352218 394101 882942 702121 170179 203335 / 43 > 397 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (12, 33)-sequence in base 3 | [i] | Net from Sequence | |
2 | No (12, 12+k, 34)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large k | [i] | Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m) | |
3 | No (12, m, 34)-net in base 3 with unbounded m | [i] | ||
4 | No digital (12, 12+k, 34)-net over F3 for arbitrarily large k | [i] | ||
5 | No digital (12, m, 34)-net over F3 with unbounded m | [i] |