Information on Result #1856503

There is no (164, 174)-sequence in base 2, because net from sequence would yield (164, m, 175)-net in base 2 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (164, 174)-sequence in base 2 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (164, m, 174)-net in base 2 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (164, 174)-sequence over F2 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (164, m, 174)-net over F2 with m > ∞ [i]