Information on Result #1856729

There is no (129, 271)-sequence in base 3, because net from sequence would yield (129, m, 272)-net in base 3 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 271)-sequence in base 3 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (129, m, 271)-net in base 3 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (129, 271)-sequence over F3 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (129, m, 271)-net over F3 with m > ∞ [i]