Information on Result #1856902

There is no (51, 167)-sequence in base 4, because net from sequence would yield (51, m, 168)-net in base 4 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 167)-sequence in base 4 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (51, m, 167)-net in base 4 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (51, 167)-sequence over F4 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (51, m, 167)-net over F4 with m > ∞ [i]