Information on Result #1857506

There is no (92, 669)-sequence in base 8, because net from sequence would yield (92, m, 670)-net in base 8 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 669)-sequence in base 8 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (92, m, 669)-net in base 8 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (92, 669)-sequence over F8 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (92, m, 669)-net over F8 with m > ∞ [i]