Information on Result #1858105

There is no (64, 1722)-sequence in base 27, because net from sequence would yield (64, m, 1723)-net in base 27 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 1722)-sequence in base 27 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (64, m, 1722)-net in base 27 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (64, 1722)-sequence over F27 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (64, m, 1722)-net over F27 with m > ∞ [i]