Information on Result #1858288

There is no (96, 3046)-sequence in base 32, because net from sequence would yield (96, m, 3047)-net in base 32 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 3046)-sequence in base 32 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (96, m, 3046)-net in base 32 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (96, 3046)-sequence over F32 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (96, m, 3046)-net over F32 with m > ∞ [i]