Information on Result #2026458

There is no OA(2134, 299, S2, 54), because adding a parity check bit would yield OA(2135, 300, S2, 55), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OA(2134, 299, S2, 55) [i]Strength Reduction
2No OA(2133, 298, S2, 54) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
3No OA(2132, 297, S2, 54) [i]
4No OA(2131, 296, S2, 54) [i]
5No OA(2130, 295, S2, 54) [i]
6No OA(2129, 294, S2, 54) [i]
7No OA(2128, 293, S2, 54) [i]
8No OA(2127, 292, S2, 54) [i]
9No OOA(2135, 299, S2, 2, 55) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
10No OOA(2134, 299, S2, 2, 54) [i]Depth Reduction
11No OOA(2134, 299, S2, 3, 54) [i]
12No OOA(2134, 299, S2, 4, 54) [i]
13No OOA(2134, 299, S2, 5, 54) [i]
14No OOA(2134, 299, S2, 6, 54) [i]
15No OOA(2134, 299, S2, 7, 54) [i]
16No OOA(2134, 299, S2, 8, 54) [i]
17No (80, 134, 299)-net in base 2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
18No linear OA(2242, 408, F2, 108) (dual of [408, 166, 109]-code) [i]Residual Code