Information on Result #2156252
There is no linear OA(295, 129, F2, 44) (dual of [129, 34, 45]-code), because adding a parity check bit would yield linear OA(296, 130, F2, 45) (dual of [130, 34, 46]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(296, 129, F2, 2, 45) (dual of [(129, 2), 162, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(295, 129, F2, 2, 44) (dual of [(129, 2), 163, 45]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 3 | No linear OOA(295, 129, F2, 3, 44) (dual of [(129, 3), 292, 45]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(295, 129, F2, 4, 44) (dual of [(129, 4), 421, 45]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(295, 129, F2, 5, 44) (dual of [(129, 5), 550, 45]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(295, 129, F2, 6, 44) (dual of [(129, 6), 679, 45]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 7 | No linear OOA(295, 129, F2, 7, 44) (dual of [(129, 7), 808, 45]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 8 | No linear OOA(295, 129, F2, 8, 44) (dual of [(129, 8), 937, 45]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 9 | No digital (51, 95, 129)-net over F2 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array | |