Information on Result #2156260

There is no linear OA(2149, 178, F2, 70) (dual of [178, 29, 71]-code), because adding a parity check bit would yield linear OA(2150, 179, F2, 71) (dual of [179, 29, 72]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2150, 178, F2, 2, 71) (dual of [(178, 2), 206, 72]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
2No linear OOA(2152, 178, F2, 2, 73) (dual of [(178, 2), 204, 74]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2149, 178, F2, 2, 70) (dual of [(178, 2), 207, 71]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2149, 178, F2, 3, 70) (dual of [(178, 3), 385, 71]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2149, 178, F2, 4, 70) (dual of [(178, 4), 563, 71]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2149, 178, F2, 5, 70) (dual of [(178, 5), 741, 71]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2149, 178, F2, 6, 70) (dual of [(178, 6), 919, 71]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2149, 178, F2, 7, 70) (dual of [(178, 7), 1097, 71]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2149, 178, F2, 8, 70) (dual of [(178, 8), 1275, 71]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (79, 149, 178)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
11No linear OA(2150, 194, F2, 70) (dual of [194, 44, 71]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)