Information on Result #2235446

Linear OA(449, 57, F4, 35) (dual of [57, 8, 36]-code), using 8 times truncation based on linear OA(457, 65, F4, 43) (dual of [65, 8, 44]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(4106, 114, F4, 71) (dual of [114, 8, 72]-code) [i]Repeating Each Code Word
2Linear OA(4105, 112, F4, 71) (dual of [112, 7, 72]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(4104, 110, F4, 71) (dual of [110, 6, 72]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(2155, 171, F2, 71) (dual of [171, 16, 72]-code) [i]Concatenation of Two Codes
5Linear OA(2154, 168, F2, 71) (dual of [168, 14, 72]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(2153, 165, F2, 71) (dual of [165, 12, 72]-code) [i]
7Linear OOA(2212, 114, F2, 2, 107) (dual of [(114, 2), 16, 108]-NRT-code) [i]Concatenation of Two NRT-Codes
8Linear OOA(2210, 112, F2, 2, 107) (dual of [(112, 2), 14, 108]-NRT-code) [i]
9Linear OOA(449, 28, F4, 2, 35) (dual of [(28, 2), 7, 36]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
10Linear OOA(449, 19, F4, 3, 35) (dual of [(19, 3), 8, 36]-NRT-code) [i]