Information on Result #2235604

Linear OA(442, 62, F4, 24) (dual of [62, 20, 25]-code), using 2 times truncation based on linear OA(444, 64, F4, 26) (dual of [64, 20, 27]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(4104, 124, F4, 49) (dual of [124, 20, 50]-code) [i]Repeating Each Code Word
2Linear OA(4103, 122, F4, 49) (dual of [122, 19, 50]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(4102, 120, F4, 49) (dual of [120, 18, 50]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(4101, 118, F4, 49) (dual of [118, 17, 50]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(4100, 116, F4, 49) (dual of [116, 16, 50]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(499, 114, F4, 49) (dual of [114, 15, 50]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(498, 112, F4, 49) (dual of [112, 14, 50]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(497, 110, F4, 49) (dual of [110, 13, 50]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(496, 108, F4, 49) (dual of [108, 12, 50]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(2146, 186, F2, 49) (dual of [186, 40, 50]-code) [i]Concatenation of Two Codes
11Linear OA(2145, 183, F2, 49) (dual of [183, 38, 50]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(2144, 180, F2, 49) (dual of [180, 36, 50]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(2143, 177, F2, 49) (dual of [177, 34, 50]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(2142, 174, F2, 49) (dual of [174, 32, 50]-code) [i]
15Linear OA(2141, 171, F2, 49) (dual of [171, 30, 50]-code) [i]
16Linear OA(2140, 168, F2, 49) (dual of [168, 28, 50]-code) [i]
17Linear OA(2139, 165, F2, 49) (dual of [165, 26, 50]-code) [i]
18Linear OOA(442, 31, F4, 2, 24) (dual of [(31, 2), 20, 25]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
19Linear OOA(442, 20, F4, 3, 24) (dual of [(20, 3), 18, 25]-NRT-code) [i]