Information on Result #225669
There is no OOA(218, 89, S2, 3, 7), because 1 step m-reduction would yield OOA(217, 89, S2, 2, 6), but
- the generalized Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 133412 > 217 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No OOA(218, 89, S2, 4, 7) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No OOA(218, 89, S2, 5, 7) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No OOA(218, 89, S2, 6, 7) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No OOA(218, 89, S2, 7, 7) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No OOA(218, 89, S2, 8, 7) | [i] | ||