Information on Result #2439706
Linear OOA(4113, 58, F4, 2, 92) (dual of [(58, 2), 3, 93]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(4113, 58, F4, 2, 95) (dual of [(58, 2), 3, 96]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(45, 4, F4, 2, 5) (dual of [(4, 2), 3, 6]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;3,4) [i]
- linear OOA(4105, 54, F4, 2, 89) (dual of [(54, 2), 3, 90]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 6 times [i] based on linear OOA(415, 9, F4, 2, 14) (dual of [(9, 2), 3, 15]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- repeating each code word 6 times [i] based on linear OOA(415, 9, F4, 2, 14) (dual of [(9, 2), 3, 15]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(45, 4, F4, 2, 5) (dual of [(4, 2), 3, 6]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.