Information on Result #2441257
Linear OOA(4167, 85, F4, 2, 137) (dual of [(85, 2), 3, 138]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(4167, 85, F4, 2, 140) (dual of [(85, 2), 3, 141]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(45, 4, F4, 2, 5) (dual of [(4, 2), 3, 6]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;3,4) [i]
- linear OOA(4159, 81, F4, 2, 134) (dual of [(81, 2), 3, 135]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 9 times [i] based on linear OOA(415, 9, F4, 2, 14) (dual of [(9, 2), 3, 15]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- repeating each code word 9 times [i] based on linear OOA(415, 9, F4, 2, 14) (dual of [(9, 2), 3, 15]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(45, 4, F4, 2, 5) (dual of [(4, 2), 3, 6]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.