Information on Result #2451527
Linear OOA(967, 35, F9, 2, 61) (dual of [(35, 2), 3, 62]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(967, 35, F9, 2, 63) (dual of [(35, 2), 3, 64]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(911, 7, F9, 2, 11) (dual of [(7, 2), 3, 12]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(911, 9, F9, 2, 11) (dual of [(9, 2), 7, 12]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(911, 9, F9, 2, 11) (dual of [(9, 2), 7, 12]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(953, 28, F9, 2, 51) (dual of [(28, 2), 3, 52]-NRT-code), using
- standard lengthening with (d0,…,d1) = (50,51) [i] based on linear OOA(951, 27, F9, 2, 49) (dual of [(27, 2), 3, 50]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,4P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- linear OOA(911, 7, F9, 2, 11) (dual of [(7, 2), 3, 12]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.