Information on Result #2456603
Linear OOA(2180, 91, F2, 2, 134) (dual of [(91, 2), 2, 135]-NRT-code), using 80 step truncation based on linear OOA(2260, 131, F2, 2, 214) (dual of [(131, 2), 2, 215]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2260, 131, F2, 2, 217) (dual of [(131, 2), 2, 218]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(22, 2, F2, 2, 2) (dual of [(2, 2), 2, 3]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;2,2) [i]
- linear OOA(2256, 129, F2, 2, 214) (dual of [(129, 2), 2, 215]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 43 times [i] based on linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,2) [i]
- repeating each code word 43 times [i] based on linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(3, 2), 2, 5]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(22, 2, F2, 2, 2) (dual of [(2, 2), 2, 3]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.