Information on Result #2469919
Linear OOA(4254, 129, F4, 2, 212) (dual of [(129, 2), 4, 213]-NRT-code), using 6 step truncation based on linear OOA(4260, 132, F4, 2, 218) (dual of [(132, 2), 4, 219]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(490, 47, F4, 2, 74) (dual of [(47, 2), 4, 75]-NRT-code), using
- 6 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(496, 50, F4, 2, 80) (dual of [(50, 2), 4, 81]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(168, 10, F16, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(168, 16, F16, 8) (dual of [16, 8, 9]-code or 16-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(168, 16, F16, 8) (dual of [16, 8, 9]-code or 16-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- linear OOA(48, 5, F4, 2, 8) (dual of [(5, 2), 2, 9]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,4) [i]
- linear OA(168, 10, F16, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- 6 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(496, 50, F4, 2, 80) (dual of [(50, 2), 4, 81]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(4166, 85, F4, 2, 143) (dual of [(85, 2), 4, 144]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1615, 17, F16, 15) (dual of [17, 2, 16]-code or 17-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,16) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,16) [i]
- linear OOA(48, 5, F4, 2, 8) (dual of [(5, 2), 2, 9]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OA(1615, 17, F16, 15) (dual of [17, 2, 16]-code or 17-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OOA(490, 47, F4, 2, 74) (dual of [(47, 2), 4, 75]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.