Information on Result #2654888
Linear OOA(2168, 61, F2, 3, 95) (dual of [(61, 3), 15, 96]-NRT-code), using 11 step truncation based on linear OOA(2179, 65, F2, 3, 106) (dual of [(65, 3), 16, 107]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2179, 65, F2, 3, 109) (dual of [(65, 3), 16, 110]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(169, 13, F16, 9) (dual of [13, 4, 10]-code or 13-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- linear OOA(211, 5, F2, 3, 10) (dual of [(5, 3), 4, 11]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,4P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- linear OA(169, 13, F16, 9) (dual of [13, 4, 10]-code or 13-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.