Information on Result #2659311
Linear OOA(3193, 65, F3, 3, 155) (dual of [(65, 3), 2, 156]-NRT-code), using 31 step truncation based on linear OOA(3224, 76, F3, 3, 186) (dual of [(76, 3), 4, 187]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(917, 19, F9, 16) (dual of [19, 2, 17]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(918, 20, F9, 17) (dual of [20, 2, 18]-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OA(98, 10, F9, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,9) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,9) [i]
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OA(98, 10, F9, 8) (dual of [10, 2, 9]-code or 10-arc in PG(7,9)), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(918, 20, F9, 17) (dual of [20, 2, 18]-code), using
- linear OOA(310, 4, F3, 3, 10) (dual of [(4, 3), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(3;2,3) [i]
- linear OA(917, 19, F9, 16) (dual of [19, 2, 17]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.