Information on Result #2781088
Linear OOA(2170, 43, F2, 4, 147) (dual of [(43, 4), 2, 148]-NRT-code), using 88 step truncation based on linear OOA(2258, 65, F2, 4, 235) (dual of [(65, 4), 2, 236]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2258, 65, F2, 4, 237) (dual of [(65, 4), 2, 238]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(26, 2, F2, 4, 6) (dual of [(2, 4), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(4;2,2) [i]
- linear OOA(2250, 63, F2, 4, 230) (dual of [(63, 4), 2, 231]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 21 times [i] based on linear OOA(210, 3, F2, 4, 10) (dual of [(3, 4), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;2,2) [i]
- repeating each code word 21 times [i] based on linear OOA(210, 3, F2, 4, 10) (dual of [(3, 4), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(26, 2, F2, 4, 6) (dual of [(2, 4), 2, 7]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.