Information on Result #2847704
Linear OOA(2246, 79, F2, 5, 93) (dual of [(79, 5), 149, 94]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(2246, 79, F2, 5, 94) (dual of [(79, 5), 149, 95]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(293, 35, F2, 5, 47) (dual of [(35, 5), 82, 48]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(5;F,112P) ⊂ AG(5;F,120P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(286, 32, F2, 5, 47) (dual of [(32, 5), 74, 48]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(5;F,112P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- linear OOA(278, 32, F2, 5, 39) (dual of [(32, 5), 82, 40]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(5;F,120P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33 (see above)
- linear OOA(27, 3, F2, 5, 7) (dual of [(3, 5), 8, 8]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(5;8,2) [i]
- construction X applied to AG(5;F,112P) ⊂ AG(5;F,120P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(2153, 44, F2, 5, 94) (dual of [(44, 5), 67, 95]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(5;F,19P) ⊂ AG(5;F,20P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(2149, 42, F2, 5, 95) (dual of [(42, 5), 61, 96]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(5;F,19P) with degPÂ =Â 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- linear OOA(2143, 42, F2, 5, 89) (dual of [(42, 5), 67, 90]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(5;F,20P) with degPÂ =Â 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42 (see above)
- linear OOA(24, 2, F2, 5, 4) (dual of [(2, 5), 6, 5]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(5;6,2) [i]
- construction X applied to AG(5;F,19P) ⊂ AG(5;F,20P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(293, 35, F2, 5, 47) (dual of [(35, 5), 82, 48]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.