Information on Result #3021557
There is no (44, 67, 299)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (44, 66, 299)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 74 965175 959254 931390 > 266 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.