Information on Result #3021741
There is no (45, 86, 112)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (45, 85, 112)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(285, 112, S2, 40), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 155 688291 100686 564892 413458 907136 / 3 717945 > 285 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.