Information on Result #3024356
There is no (61, 164, 118)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (61, 163, 118)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 127646 538126 521650 734243 301766 050765 517015 236854 > 2163 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.