Information on Result #3025197
There is no (67, 128, 186)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (67, 127, 186)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 178 345999 389759 988268 343295 782517 158576 > 2127 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.