Information on Result #3025223
There is no (67, 164, 136)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (67, 163, 136)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 590359 367750 178090 387354 018804 267796 858988 852264 > 2163 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.