Information on Result #3026843
There is no (80, 161, 199)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (80, 160, 199)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 587760 117730 532977 596747 652886 057946 202343 981864 > 2160 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.